What irked me most about J F Boylan’s
Op-Ed in the NY Times was the statement "It's impossible for me and all
those other parents, not to want to shield our young from the many accidents we
know are waiting for them".
So I responded to the Editor:
Intriguing how Ms. Boylan intertwines themes of parental responsibility as
it pertains to thrill-seeking adventures and then love, as it pertains to her
gender decision. A parent’s primary responsibilities are safety and protection;
love and respect are secondary. If Ms. Boylan believes that “many accidents are
waiting” for her children, then for God’s sake she should do her job as a
parent and instill in them an understanding of recreation and adventure that
excludes bungee jumping and sky-diving. When my adult children explore the
world, I know they’ll research shark-cage diving and understand the waters are
“chummed” to incite sharks into a feeding frenzy. They’ll surely have the
common sense to go swimming in a different risk pool.